1. What is the current industry data pain point?
In the traditional model, periodic inspection is conducted by inspection organizations while routine inspection is conducted by the owner, and the two data sets have long been isolated, often stored on paper or in separate platforms. The value of historical data is hard to unlock and utilization is low.
2. What changes does data integration bring?
Periodic inspection no longer requires a full-bridge scan; supplementary measurement of specific points is enough to generate a compliant periodic inspection report, greatly reducing labor and time cost. Inspection defect trends, monitoring sensor data and periodic inspection results corroborate each other, helping owners grasp the bridge’s true condition and make correct maintenance decisions.
3. Value of integrating the three data types
| Data | Value |
|---|---|
| Inspection data | High-frequency defect status and trends |
| Periodic inspection data | Compliant evaluation and scoring |
| Monitoring data | Real-time status and alerts |
4. Applicable conditions and scenarios
- Maintenance agencies needing integration of inspection, periodic inspection and monitoring data
- Expressway and municipal owners focused on long-term data asset value
- A direction of digital maintenance the industry is progressively advancing
5. Notes
Data integration involves multi-system integration and data standard unification; it is recommended to advance in phases, starting with inspection + periodic inspection integration.