1. How is a component-based report organized?
The inspection report is organized by part and component in chapters: each component tallies defect types and counts, forming a detailed defect list where each list item corresponds to defect images (overall image, close-up image, 3D model positioning). Compared with traditional reports that describe positions directionally (e.g. “at so many meters of a component”), the system precisely restores defect positions onto the 3D model.
2. What customization does the report support?
Reports support filtering out irrelevant minor defects by defect type, size and severity level, customizing statistics rules, content display items and ordering to fit different owners’ management needs, making it convenient for maintenance and management personnel to view distribution and formulate maintenance plans.
3. Applicable scenarios for component-based reports
| Scenario | Application |
|---|---|
| Defect archiving | Classified management by component dimension |
| Maintenance decisions | Locate defect distribution and priorities |
| Periodic inspection integration | Align with component coding standards |
4. Applicable conditions and scenarios
- Owners and inspection organizations needing component-dimension defect archiving
- Report content and ordering customized per customer rules
- Integration with bridge component coding and periodic inspection standards
5. Notes
Component-based reports must align with the bridge component coding system; it is recommended to confirm the coding rules during the solution phase.